Agree with Sophie's and Daniel's POV. Civic technology like this has been proved successful in many countries/areas including Taiwan.
BTW, even if it becomes 15th useless channel, which can be tweaked, tried and improved from the running experiences, it will not be a big deal IMO. -- Franklin Weng Deputy Chairman, Board of Director & Member, Certification Committee The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint 2020年7月17日 20:32:19 sophi <so...@libreoffice.org>: > Hi, > Le 09/07/2020 à 16:03, Daniel Armando Rodriguez a écrit : >> El 2020-07-09 06:05, Ilmari Lauhakangas escribió: >>> Thorsten Behrens kirjoitti 9.7.2020 klo 11.44: >>>> Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: >>>>> DemocracyOS vs. anything we currently have is an apples to oranges >>>>> comparison meaning we *can't* shut anything down. >>>>> >>>> But how would DemocracyOS then help to solve the too-many-channels >>>> problem? >>> >>> In my view it would not help solve that specific problem. I guess the >>> idea was instead to have a channel geared towards a very specific >>> purpose (feedback to TDF governance) with an interface that would be >>> pleasant for the majority. >> >> Ilmari did the reading I was aiming at. >> >> One example, spanish ML has 329 subscribers so far. Takign just the 1% >> of the spanish speaking people worldwide, which is about 500 millions, >> that number is not even insignificant. >> >> That's the main reason that motivates me, to bring new users closer >> through a channel more in tune with the current times and, therefore, >> something that most computer users are used to. > > I agree, and by the way, it's not yet another communication channel as > some may see it, it's a participative platform to collect feedback from > large groups in an organized way either by comments, supports or votesœ. > Decision takers spend less time to analyze and sort the feedback > provided than on mailing lists. For a project of our size, I feel it's > also needed to have participatory mechanisms that are welcoming to NLPs > too and civic technologies are an answer to that. > Thorsten, I understand your fears that the communication may spread over > another tool, but it's a matter of education and contributors will > quickly see the advantages of using it instead of posting on Telegram, > BZ or mailing lists because it's exactly done for governance. It's also > a way to value their feedback by having a mean to support it. > > Cheers > Sophie > > -- > Sophie Gautier so...@libreoffice.org > GSM: +33683901545 > IRC: sophi > Foundation coordinator > The Document Foundation > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ > Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
