Hi Thorsten, hi all,
Am 22.10.22 um 16:07 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Hi Andreas, all,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
Am 21.10.22 um 15:18 schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:54 PM Andreas Mantke <ma...@gmx.de> wrote:
if I read the minutes correctly there are four board members
with a CoI, because they provided or were involved in
providing LibreOffice in the app stores within their company /
brand.
No, you do not read the minutes correctly. No-one declared a conflict
of interests. The directors involved declared an interest, but did not
feel that it was in conflict with their duties as directors and
consequently there was no conflict of interest.
That is indeed what happened.
People in the meeting will have noticed, that there was in fact
consensus on how to proceed with the app stores. Hardly an indication
of diverging (or conflicting) interests.
I'd expect you to read the document from the European Commission, linked
in the mail from Paolo Vecchi in this thread.
Then you'll find out that CoI is not about postmortem but it is a policy
in front of a discussion/decision/process. It is also sufficient that
are a _possible_ CoI on a topic.
Thus it is nonessential what was the outcome of the discussion/talk
(because this is postmortem).
If there is only the chance of a _possible_ CoI in front of a
discussion/decision/process the ones with such a possible CoI has to
leave the meeting (You could get that really clear from the above
European Commission document).
Regards,
Andreas
--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
