On 7/20/07, Andrew Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I think we should use these.
>
> Please use the C++ standard instead. It is the only authoritative
> source, and the SGI docs are not always consistent with it.
Good point. Out of which version of the standard should we be
referencing? I have a copy of the 1998 first edition floating around
on my laptop, but I can't seem to tell if that's the most recent
published version. I'd hate to be writing docs for something a couple
years out of date.
Andrew Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If that is the most recent version, could you post that to the Vault, or an
otherwise accessible location? I feel that that could come in handy for this
project :)
Jake
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
