on Fri Jul 20 2007, "Jake Voytko" <jakevoytko-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/20/07, Andrew Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> So I think we should use these. > > > > Please use the C++ standard instead. It is the only authoritative > > source, and the SGI docs are not always consistent with it. > > Good point. Out of which version of the standard should we be > referencing? I have a copy of the 1998 first edition floating around > on my laptop, but I can't seem to tell if that's the most recent > published version. I'd hate to be writing docs for something a couple > years out of date. > > Andrew Sutton > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If that is the most recent version, could you post that to the > Vault, or an otherwise accessible location? I feel that that could > come in handy for this project :) Please don't. That would be illegal, as it's under copyright. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
