> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel de Guzman > Sent: 11 December 2002 23:02 > To: Boost mailing list > Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Call for Volunteers [license review] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joel de Guzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > PS> One question: Why is GPL not in the list? I assume it's because > > it is known to fail the given criteria? Correct me if I'm > mistaken. If so, the > > wxWindows Library License should also be out of the list. wxWindows > > Library License states that: > > > > This library is free software; you can redistribute it > and/or modify it under > > the terms of the GNU Library General Public Licence as > published by the > > Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the Licence, > or (at your option) > > any later version. > > Whoops, I'm sorry, I didn't catch the Library in "GNU Library > General Public > Licence". So then, consider wxWindows Library License done as > it is the same > as LGPL. >
Not quiet. But it still fails. It also allows you to distribute modified binaries that are extensions of the library under your own terms. /ikh _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
