"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > This is a formal call for volunteers to fill out a few of the > open-source license evaluations at > http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License >
OCLC Research Public License done - fails. Incorporates a potentially useful technique for dealing with "source code" versus "binary" distributions. Rather than using those terms, this license speaks in terms of distributions which and end-user can modify (source code) or cannot modify (object code). The one blatent failure is that this license requires an attribution in or with binary distributions. Open Software License done - fails. This license requires that all derivative works must also use this license. -cd _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost