At 10:22 AM 1/8/2003, David Abrahams wrote: >Greg Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> At 04:02 PM 1/7/2003, David Abrahams wrote: >>>... >>> >>>I can barely think of a reasonable design where GC is a big design win >>>;-) >> >> A Python interpreter? > >I obviously have a poor imagination ;-)
More seriously, I've never found GC necessary except for writing interpreters for garbage collected languages. But once GC is there I have found it very liberating to not worry about memory leaks and dangling pointers, and not think about ownership except for non-memory resources. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
