> From: David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here, > > or should I use the std:: exceptions? > > IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides > more-specific information.
What extra information do you want provided? William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
