"William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here, >> > or should I use the std:: exceptions? >> >> IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides >> more-specific information. > > What extra information do you want provided?
For example, that it was a threading library exception. Information carried by the type identity may be enough. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost