> From: "Stefano Delli Ponti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here, > > > or should I use the std:: exceptions? > > > > IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides > > more-specific information. > > Agreed. And we should keep coherence with the filesystem library.
I'm not sure there's any coherence to keep here. Do you have specific concerns/thoughts here? William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
