"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes, a class is it's own superclass/subclass, but IMO not it's own > > base: so it is a bug in the implementation. > > I'd like to suggest changing the documentation to match the > implementation at this point. I know of a few places where I have > relied on the current semantics, and I'm sure that's the case for > others as well. I'm not set on this course, but I think it's worth > considering.
At the cost of adding an extra name, maybe it would be nice to provide is_base_and_derived and is_super_and_subclass. Andrei _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
