Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:27:25 -0500, David Abrahams > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Soooo... Somewhere back in this thread Peter Dimov raised a serious >>question about whether this implements the semantics we want. Was >>there ever agreement on that? > > Who cares? The new toy is so cool! :-) Seriously, Peter is a wise man. > Personally I would go with his suggestion about having two (or more) > separate metafunctions, at least for the sake of generality
I'd rather settle on one for the sake of simplicity and see if it's enough for people. Once you provide two interfaces, you're sort of stuck supporting them both. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost