"Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > Well, then I imagine you would prefer the old semantics. Was there > anybody complaining that being not enough? >
Yes, I was. A while back, I pointed out to Rani that is_base_and_derived was insufficient to implement is_com_ptr, a trait I needed. In COM programming, every interface inherits from IUnknown, and many COM objects implement multiple interfaces. So is_base_and_derived<IUnknown, MyCOMObject> was almost always ambiguous. I was content to gripe, but Rani actually did something about it. The new behavior of is_base_and_derived is very welcome, IMO. Eric _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
