Gennaro Prota wrote: > > to avoid changes not forced by compiler bugs. Incidentally, I noticed > that if you add a default argument > > template<typename T> > static yes check(D const volatile *, T = 0); > static no check(B const volatile *, int = 0); > > and write: > > sizeof(checker<B,D>::check( (C()) /*, 0*/ )) > > then ambiguity problems arise, even with Comeau 4.3.0.1. Defect in the > standard?
What should the compiler deduce for T? Argument type deduction doesn't work well with default parameters. There is already a DR (IIRC) that would allow: template<typename T = int> static yes check(D const volatile *, T = 0); but I don't know if any compilers implement it yet. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
