"Greg Colvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > And I proposed something like this years before that, but > foundered on not being able to declare a type-safe variadic > function in C++.
Do you suppose that with the PP lib, we should try something like this now? If I understand correctly, we should be able to offer both unmanaged and managed construction, right? That way, we retain legacy compatibility, while offering users a safer way to use smart pointers. I'll bet this is just the type of challenge that Paul Mensonides would like to take on. ;> Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
