Greg Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 10:48 AM 1/31/2003, David Abrahams wrote: >>Greg Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> At 09:53 AM 1/31/2003, David Abrahams wrote: >>>>... >>>>In fact, I have been arguing for years that our smart pointers should >>>>never have had a public interface which adopts unmanaged resources on >>>>construction. Instead, we should write: >>>> >>>> std::auto_ptr<T> = std::auto_ptr_new<T>(arg1, arg2, arg3); >>>> >>>>Voila, a managed T straight out of the box. >>> >>> And I proposed something like this years before that, but >>> foundered on not being able to declare a type-safe variadic >>> function in C++. >> >>The move/forwarding proposals will fix that. In the meantime we have >>boost::ref(x)... ugly but effective. > > Can you give us link to that proposal?
You can find it in http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/mailings/papers/2002/pre_santacruz.zip Sorry, it's not truly varadic, it's "up to N args." -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
