"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> b1ehpj$j1n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b1ehpj$j1n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Actually, you can control mixing by determining which policies can be
>> constructed from which other policies. I just didn't know if it was a
>> good idea to let users freely mix auto_ptr with shared_ptr. But I
>> suppose if they get an auto_ptr from legacy code, and they want it to be
>> managed by shared_ptr, that is a legitimate use.
>
>
> Indeed. Having policies decide which way, if at all, they plan to
> interoperate, is imho a key strenght of pbd.
I keep forgetting how nicely that works.
Thanks for the reminder,
Dave
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
