[2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote: > > >On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote: > >> [2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote: >> > >> >I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the >> >[ ... ] >> >> Some questions... >> >> Are the errors in Boost code, or your code? >err...both (boost code that happens to be my code :) ).
Ah, got it ;-) >> Are you using Boost.Build for Boost only, or for your builds also? >I'm only using Boost.Build to run the regression tests -- specifically for >Boost.Multiarray, a library I maintain. My rationale for requesting the >addition is that at least multi_array passed all regression tests without >it, though stricter (wrt the C++ Standard) compilers (that I do >not have access to :) ) reject it. It seems to me that enabling >stricter adherence to the Standard (at least as per the EDG front-end used >in icc) by default would be a Good thing. It would be a good thing, IMO. But not for those that don't want it ;-] For example those people using Boost.Build for non-Boost building. What this suggest is adding support in Boost.Build for specifying standards conformance levels for the toolsets. But for now I would suggest you change the multi_array tests to add that flag, that is if you think it's important in this case. Taking one of your tests as an example: [ run libs/multi_array/test/constructors.cpp <lib>../libs/test/build/boost_test_exec_monitor : : : <intel-linux><*><cflags>-ansi ] -- grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 102708583@icq _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost