On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 PM [GMT+1=CET], Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote: > > > [2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote: > > > > > > I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the > > > [ ... ] > > > > Some questions... > > > > Are the errors in Boost code, or your code? > err...both (boost code that happens to be my code :) ). > > > > > Are you using Boost.Build for Boost only, or for your builds also? > I'm only using Boost.Build to run the regression tests -- specifically for > Boost.Multiarray, a library I maintain. My rationale for requesting the > addition is that at least multi_array passed all regression tests without > it, though stricter (wrt the C++ Standard) compilers (that I do > not have access to :) ) reject it. It seems to me that enabling > stricter adherence to the Standard (at least as per the EDG front-end used > in icc) by default would be a Good thing. It is our usual policy to run in "most conforming, plus extensions mode". IOW, extensions like long long and platform-specific capabilities like __cdecl are typically enabled when they're available. What does -ansi add/remove from the capabilities of Intel C++? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
