Greg Colvin wrote: > > Any thoughts on this issue? My thoughts:
a) *errno* (the C99/POSIX.1-2001/SUSv3 "edition" of it). b) *lazy* is good. Well, http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3DA6C62A.AB8FF3D3%40web.de (Subject: Re: local statics and TLS objects) https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phil-list/2002-November/000322.html (faster pthread_getspecific) regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
