It's not a compiler thing. Look at the implementation:
http://www.boost.org/boost/detail/call_traits.hpp
template <typename T>
struct call_traits<T&>
{
typedef T& value_type; // <-- problem here
typedef T& reference;
typedef const T& const_reference;
typedef T& param_type; // hh removed const
};
Thanks,
Eric
"Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The way call_traits is currently implemented,
> > call_traits<int&>::value_type
> > is an int&, not an int.
>
> Maybe it's due to lack of partial specialization. What compiler are you
> using?
> Without PTS y oucould not deduce int from int&.
>
> Gennadiy.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
