"Darren Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] > I wanted something like the call stack that shows in python or java when an > uncaught exception occurs;
I tried to start a discussion on something similar, although I wanted language support. However, one of my points also were (and is) that it would be nice not only for uncaught exceptions, but also for running programs. My concern is that we have no standard mechanism for inspecting the errors in running programs when they (perhaps) have shipped to the customer. What is particularly irritating is that one instance of a program might work "perfect" whereas another instance may contain errors. If we cannot inspect those errors, we're in trouple if we cannot redo these errors . The entire thread can be found here: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=da&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b1g8ca%2497i%241%40s unsite.dk regards Thorsten _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
