"Russell Hind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Johan Nilsson wrote: > > > > I might be a bit off here (coming in late into the discussion), but I'd > > prefer consistency in my code; using microsec_clock for both Windows and > > Unix code - even if the real 'resolution' is dependent of the system time > > updates on the Win platforms. > > > > That is an option, but if a millisecond clock is introduced, it like to > see it implemented on all platforms, then you could use that on all > platforms rather than microsec_clock which isn't 'really' supported > under windows. At least this way you are dealing with a known resolution. >
Yes, but why not have both on all platforms? // Johan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
