>> I've just installed 3.3.1 on Windows, and am getting those same four >> failure plus failures from: >> >> date_time/testmicrosec_time_clock (runtime failure) > >This is likely due to the posix API call to std::time not providing >stable return values. That is, when I sample the time rapidly the second >value is less than the previous value. So this is more of a platform / >library issue than a compiler issue. This isn't a new problem with this >particular configuration...
OK, I've added a note to that effect. Consider the failure accounted for.
Is there any point to report this to someone? Cygwin?
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
