Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 02:38:15PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: >On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:27:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> How about "master_upper"? This is already widely used to refer to >> >> bond/team/bridge/other master soft devices. >> >> >> >> MASTER_UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES? >> > >> >I'm not sure if we should avoid using "master" now. Maybe just >> >UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES? >> >> Why? We have "master_upper" to point exactly at this kind of device. > >I mean try not use "master/slave" words. I'm OK to use UPPER_DEV_* prefix.
If you don't want to use that, change the existing code. But when the existing code uses that, new code should be consistent with it. > >I will update the name if there is a next version. > >Thanks >Hangbin
