On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:27:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> How about "master_upper"? This is already widely used to refer to > >> bond/team/bridge/other master soft devices. > >> > >> MASTER_UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES? > > > >I'm not sure if we should avoid using "master" now. Maybe just > >UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES? > > Why? We have "master_upper" to point exactly at this kind of device.
I mean try not use "master/slave" words. I'm OK to use UPPER_DEV_* prefix. I will update the name if there is a next version. Thanks Hangbin
