Jon Gabriel wrote:

> >From: Jean-Louis Couturier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked
> >Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 10:43:27 -0500
> >
> >At 21:26 2002-12-04 -0600, Marvin wrote:
> >
> >>At this point I'd say that if someone disagrees, it's his obligation to
> >>say so.
> >>
> >>Marvin Long
> >>Austin, Texas
> >>Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, & Ashcroft, LLP (Formerly the USA)
> >
> >OK then, I disagree.  This whole situation is giving me the creeps.
> >Unlike most people, I don't think anyone's actually in the right here,
> >everyone's wrong.
>

> By the way, no one has "kicked Jeroen out".  He has been asked to change
> behavior and cease actions that would have been the result of a complete,
> not temporary ban on many other listservs.  AFAIK, he has an open-ended
> invitation from Nick and Julia to come back when he is willing to stop
> attacking people.

Actually no. *If* I got it correctly from Nick, at the moment he's kind of off
the list for an indefinite period of time. And if you ask me at current he
doesn't have much of a chance to return.

> Since he refuses to change his behavior and has in fact
> been escalating his attacks against Brin-L members, it's listowners and
> server privately and publicly, you might say he is trying to remove
> *himself* from the list.

I for one hold the position that where two fight there are two at fault. So just
to get things balanced a bit, and to make said point, I'd like to recall another
incident besides those you here mention (and for which the difference in
interpretation, from my European vantage point and being close to Jeroen , seems
to be solely based on cultural and language differences as well as
misunderstandings in interpretation of the written word, while taking for
granted certain biases inherent to respective interpretations and an obstinate
and uncompromising unwillingness to even try to find common ground or to remain
in peacefull disagreement for ever by both sides).

So just for the record I also clearly remember Erik for one being particularly
nasty and very childish in harrasing Jeroen even after several repeated requests
from a lot of listmembers to cut it out and leave Jeroen alone. Strangly enough
that never had any consequences whatsoever for Erik, although his behaviour was
at least partial to the disruptiveness resulting.

And while I do not explicitly object to (if there must be something stupid like
it at all that is) there being some consequenses for disruptive behaviour
(although I'd rather see them disappear and listmembers behave at least
according to their age) I do however very strongly object to the randomness of
those consequenses resulting from rather vague ideas about list policy and (if
you ask me) personal dislikes from a few that unfortunately make up a very
strong and vocal group.

Sonja
Pfew... long sentences Maru. ;o). Can you tell I have a degree?.... <grin>

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to