[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > >p.s. don't go there if you really, really don't want to see a very
> > > >scantily clad pregnant woman
> > >
> > > More scantily clad than Demi Moore on the cover of People(?) several
> > years ago?
> >
> >No, but it's, well, a little different.
> >
> >How's about, don't go there if you don't want to see a scantily clad
> >pregnant woman wearing high heels? Is that a little more descriptive?
>
> Julia et al,
>
> I don't know how anyone can not think a pregnant woman is beautiful,
> (I think that was the point of Demi's photos). You might not feel very
> beautiful, but you should. Amazing is beautiful if you see a star
> born, just think of yourself as amazing as that.
>
> Hating to see anyone think bellies determine beauty
> Dee
The particular picture in question really didn't do anything for me. I
could probably come up with 100 other outfit/pose combinations that
would be a much more attractive way of presenting a pregnant woman. It
wouldn't have done anything for me without the belly, either.
(Something about underthings and high heels just doesn't cut it for me.)
I liked the picture that was up there a year ago. *That* was a cool
photo that did a better job of showing off the bra, IMO. (It might have
not done quite as well on showing off the underwear, though.)
Julia
p.s. you can do all kinds of neat things photographically with a nice
round belly, and I think there may be a few photos around here to prove
it
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
