--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Deborah Harrell wrote: > > > Hey! What about the astronomy example I gave in > my first post this thread: > > > > "And for an even longer timeframe from observance > to 'scientific > > revision,' look at the change from an > Earth-centered to a sun-centered system! :) " > > Not a good comparison. If we looked at the sun and > planets but never > realized they were moving at all, then maybe you > would have a point. > > The problem is that you are comparing a situation > where we have a lot > of measurements and interaction with the element of > interest and have > found NOTHING to support your claim, with various > things that were based > on interpretation of data that did exist and just > required further > refinement. NOTHING does not equal SOMETHING.
<huge grin> Would you accept an area of inquiry that *men* have been pondering for ages, but claim still not to understand at all? (that last is a bit of an exaggeration...) Women! ;) OK, Dan's Answer Is Better Anyway Maru __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
