Jon Gabriel wrote:
> >>At first sight, the subject header appeared to say ' good old > >fashioned > >>bride burning'. > > > > > >Maybe that's why in Utah they frequently have wedding > >receptions at the > >stake center . . . > > Perhaps they hold secret bride burnings in the temple? Humm...... > > It would truly suck to be a groom in Utah then. No sex before OR after the > wedding.
Oh, but the grooms can get married again. And anyway, the bride is burnt only after a few days/weeks/months have passed.
Given that the population of Utah continues to grow, I'd say that it would have to be a matter of at least "years", as she would have to have more than one child to replace her and then increase the total population . . .
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
