--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see the difference between not criticizing > Chomsky, and not > criticizing Limbaugh. They both spout a lot of kooky > things. Your > argument about speaking without a script is a > rationalization -- if > Limbaugh cannot avoid ad-libbing all the nonsense > that he does, then > he should use a script or only make inane ad-lib > comments rather than > trying to ad-lib something meaningful and getting it > wrong. No script is > not an excuse.
They do. One says that Pol Pot was a pretty good guy. The other was wrong about poverty rates in the 1950s. Do you really think that they're the same? ===== Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Freedom is not free" http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
