On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:34:11PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 07:36:05AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> > >
> > > > Cancer bad. Baby may be good news or not, but cancer always bad.
> > >
> > > Not true. For example, Saddam Hussein and/or Osama bin Laden, cancer
> > > good.
> >
> > Not for Saddam or bin Laden! Cancer always bad for the person with the
> > cancer -- is that a better refinement of the statement, Erik?
>
> Don't think small, look at the big picture, Julia! Think globally, you
> know...
:)
1) Yes, it would be nice if Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden died of
cancer, the world would be better off.
2) But that still doesn't change the individual's view of having cancer.
I submit that both of us are right, just looking at different parts of the
problem.
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
