On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:35:26PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: > One final proposition. I'll be willing to look at the best 8 years > of the 14 of Reagan-Bush I & II (we don't have data for '03) and > compare then to Clinton's 8 years. I bet that I will see significant > differences in the distribution of economic growth. I'll pick the > best 8 years as the 8 years with the greatest growth. I'd call that > bending over backwards to give Reagan and Bush a fair shake.
Sounds interesting. I'd like to see that analysis! -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
