On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:10:40AM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: > The years I picked as the best are 83-89 and 92. I simply ordered the > years in terms of GDP and picked the top 8. Total growth during those > 8 years was 38.1%. Total growth during Clinton's 8 years was 34.1%. > So, by cherry picking the best years of growth under Reagan Bush^2, I > have gotten a span that is slightly better, overall, than Clinton's > years. I think this will be a more than fair basis for my analysis. > Comments are welcome,
Sounds reasonable. JDG certainly can't argue that you picked recession years for the Republicans to make them look bad w.r.t. the poor, since the years you picked actually beat Clinton in overall GDP growth. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
