From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> At 10:17 PM 2/24/2004 -0600 Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >To be honest John, this is one of those discussions where you give the
> >appearance of being a "run with the pack" kind of guy. I don't mean to
> >be insulting, but you seem to be on a "dittohead" heading lately.
>
> I am flabbergasted.
>
> I am the only Brin-L'er sticking my neck out and taking a position that I
> *know* will be very unpopular here.
>
> And *I* am running with the pack?????    Hello????
>
> I put great effort into my defense of the Federal Marriage Amendment, and
I
> doubt that you will find anything much like my post on that subject from
> any other right-wing source.


I agree with you here.  Not one right wing source I have heard from is
making as big a deal about the judges striking down the impropper order as
you are, probably because it *is* an impropper order and they know it.  By
pointing it out as a footnote, they make it look like activism, but if they
make too big an arguement about it people will learn the truth, that the
order was impropperly worded and could not be enforced as written, then
realize that there is no activism going on here, only adherance to the law.
I agree with you, you are deffinately on the fringes, not in the pack.

I actually do hope that the order, once properly worded, does go to court,
and is passed by the same judge that struck it down for being impropperly
worded.  Then that would demonstrate that George Bush's sudden endorsement
of the Federal Marriage Amendment to be an unneccessary knee-jerk reaction
based in fear.  Showing fear over such a mundane issue is not very becoming
of the president.


Michael Harney - Who is waiting for a reply to my questions, and marvels at
how John avoids replying to certain posts or portions of posts that hold the
strongest points against his arguements.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to