The state of Oregon has begun to recognize and authorize legal same-sex
marriages. (Oregon law does not define marriage as between a man and a
woman, saying only that it is restricted to men and women over 17. A
judge ruled that meant the state could not refuse to recognize same-sex
marriages, and Multnomah County, the county Portland is located in,
began performing same-sex marriages recently.) This offers us a perfect
laboratory to conduct a scientific test. Since the alarmists about
same-sex marriage are claiming it will lead to all kinds of disastrous
consequences, we are now in a position to see if they are right. Either
the universe will come to an end, or nothing much will change. I, of
course, am betting on the latter, but now we will be able to gather
some objective evidence rather than merely flap our gums.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/12/pcc/index.html
Oregon law states marriage is "a civil contract entered into by males
at least 17 years of age and females at least 17 years of age." It does
not define marriage as between one woman and one man exclusively.
The chief counsel of the Oregon Legislature advised Multnomah County
commissioners withholding marriage licenses from same-sex couples was
unconstitutional.
Commissioners then directed that licensing policy be changed to include
couples of the same gender.
Nicole Berge, psychology major at Portland Community College, said she
was shocked when she heard people of the same sex were legally marrying
in Portland. "I disagree with it completely."
She straightened in her chair. "It'll make the world go to hell. It's
corrupted already. This just adds to the list," the student, who
identified herself as a Christian and a Republican, said.
Well, we’ll soon find out.
The world is not going to go to hell (unless, like that woman quoted
above, you think it already will). The world did not go to hell when
they stopped discriminating against Jews, it did not go to hell when
slavery was abolished, it did not go to hell when they integrated Major
League Baseball, it did not go to hell when they integrated the armed
forces, it did not go to hell after Brown vs the Board of Education, it
did not go to hell after the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s, it did not
go to hell after the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s, it did
not go to hell when we had vastly increased immigration (legal and
illegal) to the US, it did not go to hell when they let women into the
military academies, and it did not go to hell when the Supreme Court
invalidated laws against racially mixed marriages (and the same kind of
people who are predicting it will go to hell now were predicting it
would go to hell after each and every one of those past events - not
much of a track record on being right with their predictions, huh?),
and it’s not going to go to hell now. Frankly, I wish the people who
make these predictions would look back on their dismal record of
inaccuracy (0%) and make the logical deduction. I’m not holding my
breath.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Tom Beck
my LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/tomfodw/
"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never thought I'd
see the last." - Dr. Jerry Pournelle
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? Tom Beck
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? Kevin Tarr
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? The Fool
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? Jan Coffey
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? Tom Beck
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? John D. Giorgis
- Re: The end of the world as we know ... Erik Reuter
- Re: The end of the world as we k... Jan Coffey
- Re: The end of the world as ... John D. Giorgis
- Re: The end of the world as ... Julia Thompson
- Re: The end of the world as we know it? Jan Coffey