On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:19:34PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> IMO that suggestion was uncalled for.
Please try to pay better attention, people...
I have been paying attention . . . for at least the past couple of years, in fact. I've noticed that most of us seem to have moved on from that less-than-happy series of events. IMO it is uncalled for to bring it up again unless at the very least someone has overwhelming proof that this is somehow related to those past events.
FWIW, I've had my address spoofed for a virus attack. I didn't figure it was anything personal. In fact, a lot of viruses that have come out during the past several months include code that randomly picks an address from the ones it harvests from people's address books and spoofs it as the "From:" address when it sends infected messages to the other addresses it harvested. That's what I figured had happened to me when someone informed me that they had received an infected file supposedly from me, and if I were to guess, that's what I'd guess happened here.
YMMV, of course. But let's not accuse anybody without proof. Particularly when doing so is likely to hurt someone else on the list.
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
