Andrew Paul wrote:
>
> Perhaps I am reading too much into it, but does that mean that
> you view humans as the ultimate peak of evolution?
> Or are we just a step on an ongoing path?
>
Humans are a peak in evolution, because we can't evolve further
except by artificial means. The saber-tooth tiger was also a peak
in evolution, and look at what happened to them.

Alberto Monteiro

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to