Andrew Paul wrote: > > Perhaps I am reading too much into it, but does that mean that > you view humans as the ultimate peak of evolution? > Or are we just a step on an ongoing path? > Humans are a peak in evolution, because we can't evolve further except by artificial means. The saber-tooth tiger was also a peak in evolution, and look at what happened to them.
Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l