* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I've given some income limits. It appears that a far better arguement > could be made for lower income examples than the range the authors > were discussing.
Which indicates to me that their fundamental point probably stands (that there are very high marginal rates for low income households), but that there are some details in their assumptions that differ slightly from yours. It seems to me that if we scaled the income labels 10 or 20% lower in the chart, that you wouldn't have an argument with it. [By the way, I am still intending to finish going through all the numbers and references over the next week or two -- thanks for the URL's] -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
