On 9/4/06, Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
No: I'm afraid WTG made a mistake in making that equation, so I won't
throw my lot in with him on that account. They're both valid points, however: Macs *do* tend to have a longer productive life than PCs and Macs *are* significantly less prone to attack than PCs for reasons that are far too boring to discuss here.
Besides Unix and its variants are el spiffo. Unlike Windows, they actually make sense. There is only one right way to do something, and if you do it like that it always works. With Windows there are a dozen ways to do anything, and none of them work all of the time. What a confusing mess. What we really need is an OS with all of the advantages of XP and Ubuntu and none of the disadvantages of either. Then maybe we would have a decent operating system. John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] *********************************************************** Do you play World of Warcraft? Let me know. Maybe we can play together. *********************************************************** All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
