On 27/10/2006, at 5:04 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
There WERE useful weapons. Period. A program, possibly. But your historical revisionism is plain and bluntly sickening. As of *2004*, Saran shells were still potentially lethal in roadside ambushes.
Once, as far as I can find.
Yes, 2 1/2 years down the line the seals used in the style of binary shells the Iraquis used, absent controlled storage, will have decayded and then they rapidly become useless. And there are no outright "lies". I never said there were.
"They're lying. Period"
What I actually said was that the fact over 700-800 shells with chemical weapon traces, more than the number which were believed he held (400- 500) is somehow NOT considered very newsworthy.
It's not newsworthy if noone can verify it. Charlie _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
