If we're going to throw out all the flawed human institutions,
nothing will be left, including your ideas.  I don't have to look
beyond my immediate family to see the injustices that our system has
allowed, but "good" isn't the same as "perfect."  Argue better,
please.

On 7/19/09, John Williams <jwilliams4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Limiting myself to the US, and just listing a few incidents that come to
> mind:
>
> Indian Removal Act
> Legal slavery
> Jim Crow laws
> Coverture
> Japanese American internment
> Joseph McCarthy
> Richard Nixon
>
> I think that any system of ethics that equates legality with doing
> what is right, that holds that the majority opinion is by definition
> good, or that suggests that elected politicians rule justly, has a lot
> of explaining to do about the incidents in this list (not to mention
> numerous others not in the list).
>
> I tend to consider ethical points on their own merits. Of course, this
> requires more thought than to simply assume law and majority opinion
> is always right.
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
>
>

_______________________________________________
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Reply via email to