Euan wrote: >I understand the problem. Context doesn't travel or easily survive in >these written forums.
>By posturing I was refering to the military deployments in Europe as an >existential threat (meaning the liklihood of them being used in an >invasion of Western, or Eastern, Europe). Ah, quite different from what I read. I'm glad we can agree upon the source of the misunderstanding. I think we may still have some reasonable differences on the Cold War which would be worth exploring, but it will probably be spread out as I have limited time at the moment for a well thought out discussion. I really do appreciate the courtesy of your assignment of our miscommunication to a neutral factor. I definitely used the wrong context. :-) Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
