I would personally like to know how many of the individuals expressing their opinions on Britdisc have contributed to the organisation of tournaments or the tour itself on any level aside from reaping the benefits of others labour.  To name Ruth's team and infer anything, joking or not Nicola, is shameful.  One member of Ruth's team is BUF president,  another I believe is integral in the maintenance of britdisc itself, another has recently organised Junior Nationals and is now organising tour 2 in Banbury (a very central location) and the team itself have run numerous tournaments including Nationals.  Hand on heart does the team really deserve anything but a vote of thanks.  Here's my tuppence, go organise a tournament.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicole Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gareth Goo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Tour Dates

> And while we're talking about numbers, if we look at the co-ed tour
> which admittedly is somewhat smaller, at nationals one of the teams was
> playing iron man, and the team consisted of some of the best players in
> british ultimate, so surely we cannot relate the number of players to
> the quality of ultimate .  There has also been many instances in the
> tour events where the top teams have only fielded a 8 or 9 strong team.
> (Maybe red just need to work on their fitness...)
>
> I do agree that something needs to be done about the tour, but
> ostricising players because of their financial position does nothing to
> improve the quality of british ultimate.
>
> Just my tuppence worth (as I feel there will be a collection of coppers
> soon)
>
> Nicole
> mohawks
>

Reply via email to