On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the detailed posting,
It was pleasure to read Harman's detailed post and then Sean's critical reply. @ Harman Reading your "Development Log" and it is good to note that you update it on daily basis. The difficulty in implementing your goal, might have forced you to undertake this review. <snip> > There's an argument that having poor usability categorically makes BRL-CAD > "not wonderful". Looks like he prepared ground before stating something not good ;-) <snip> > Presuming this is to change goals for GSoC, what exactly are you suggesting? > To not work on a web interface of some sort and instead work on C++ code (of > some sort)? It's VERY late to be drastically changing directions like this > if that's the case. Earlier you compared various options for "Web Interface", and not favoured WebGL, but my suggestion will be reconsider that as IMO that is going to be best option for your project. All the best. -- H.S.Rai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
