> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Slagell, Adam J <slag...@illinois.edu> wrote: > > I have gone over a bunch of these threads and want to bring this back towards > consensus, or at least consilience. Let’s pick from the following 5 options, > and then we can decide if these are bundles, ports, packages, plugins, > extensions, modules, or bags. > > Key criteria are clarity and simplicity. Does it give an intuitive sense of > what it is without adding confusion? No name or analogy will be perfect, but > let’s not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. > > > And the nominees are: > > 1. bpkg > 2. brow > 3. bagger > 4. bro-ports > 5. bro-brew
After talking with Matthias the other day I think the best option is simply: 6. bro-package or bro-pkg We already have things like bro-cut, and bro-aux. Broctl pretty close to bro-ctl. -- - Justin Azoff _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list bro-dev@bro.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
