Hi Vangelis, >>>>> Vangelis Evangelou <evange...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi all. > I'm not sure what the ideal outcome is. It depends on each user's case. In > principle, indirect buffers have identical text content as their base > buffer, but different view properties, so the previews not showing in the > indirect buffer agrees with this principle. I therefore, agree with Paul's > comment.
Thank you. Then I think AUCTeX can incorporate your proposal. Can you make an entry for doc/changes.texi and send the diff? To AUCTeX admins: Do you think Vangelis'es patch needs copyright assignment? In my opinion, it doesn't because definition of `TeX-buffer-file-name' is straightforward and other changes are trivial (replacements of `buffer-file-name' -> `TeX-buffer-file-name' or additions of `(with-current-buffer (or (buffer-base-buffer) (current-buffer))...') Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
