Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes: > >>> To AUCTeX admins: Do you think Vangelis'es patch needs copyright >>> assignment? In my opinion, it doesn't because definition of >>> `TeX-buffer-file-name' is straightforward and other changes are trivial >>> (replacements of `buffer-file-name' -> `TeX-buffer-file-name' or >>> additions of `(with-current-buffer (or (buffer-base-buffer) >>> (current-buffer))...') > > I committed with "Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes".
Thanks for looking after this report and sorry for the late response. Indeed, the change is large, but looking at the complexity, I think we can let it pass without copyright assignment. Also thanks to Vangelis for providing the change. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
