https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26685
--- Comment #11 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> symbol(%rip) is similar to symbol and DISP. There is no real register
> in memory operand.
I disagree - the compiler ought to emit
movdir64b foo(%eip), %eax
or
movdir64b foo(%rip), %rax
in this case, whatever fits the x32 model better. The compiler ought to in
particular be aware that the register operand of this insn is
address-size-prefix, not operand-size-/REX-prefix controlled.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
