https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26685
--- Comment #15 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14) > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #13) > > What is needed is some sort of flag to indicate that in this specific case > > it needs to be foo(%eip). > > No, we don't want 0x67 prefix for RIP-relative addressing for x32. You did read me writing "in this specific case", didn't you? I understand you don't want this in the general case. The way your (broken) change was written, you very much get a 0x67 prefix in this specific case, so I don't understand at all what you're trying to tell me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
